EMF Exposure – WHO Cares?

When I first wrote the article about EMF Exposure – The Ticking Time Bomb, I alluded to the corruption within the regulatory bodies that set standards for exposure to radiation. It appears that the World Health Organization (WHO) are only giving lip service to this major world-wide health risk. I base my claim on the following timeline of events:

• In May 2005, the WHO launched a new project called the Electromagnetic Field Project in which they set out to get studies conducted on the effects of domestic and industrial EMF sources on humans.
• In October 2014, the WHO issued a fact sheet with regard to the health risks of mobile phone use and the correlation to health. In that sheet they simply referred to the Specific Absorbsion Rate (SAR) standards and basically discounted any measurable medical consequences.
• In May 2015, a request for action was made by over 200 scientists from all over the world, that the WHO take some responsible action to conduct comprehensive studies for human exposure to ALL new technologies, including the new 4G/5G mobile phone transmitters, WiFi and domestic power line technology devices. These devices are being deployed world-wide in many inappropriate locations without regards to human health.
• In July 2023, the appeal to the WHO was reissued, as no action has been taken, despite a significant number of scientific studies that have been conducted over the last 10 years have concluded that there is evidence that humans are being damaged neurologically and at the DNA level by current exposure levels.
• In 2024 we see world-wide all-cause mortality rates increasing rapidly (over 14% jump in most countries) but also abnormal increase in cancer rates, dementia/altzheimers, and attention deficit disorders in younger people. (These all happen to be possible affects of non-ionising radiation exposure of the type found in many current technology products and deployed systems).

Human beings are complex organisms and our overall health is determined by many environment factors. Simply ignoring the effects of large quantities of EMF exposure because you can’t see an instantaneous effect, is short-sighted. Governments that are rolling out, en masse, 5G phone towers and placing them in the most inappropriate locations (e.g residential area, schools, etc.) and calling it “safe” because the SAR are being met, and the out-of-date WHO document which claims that there is “nothing to worry about”, is simply not good enough.

In this case, the elephant in the room is invisible, but it is very real and getting bigger all the time.

If you want to find out more about this, consider looking up emfscientist.org, as this group of over 250 professionals feel that, based on current medical knowledge, we should seriously review safety standards, urgently!

In the meantime, consider the personal action you take, as outlined in this article.

Since the WHO is funded by the very people who benefit from the technology deployment, this really is a case of why should the WHO care?

Remember that it took a full 50 years between when smoking was identified as a health risk and the eventual cancer/smoking correlation. This was even despite the observation that putting a burning substance in your lungs is surely going to have some consequences! If we wait for 50 years to see if the EMF we are creating is directly harming people it will definitely be too late, given what are seeing over the last 3 years. The evidence so far does not look good and basic physics would suggest that it is impossible for it NOT to a contributing factor to general poor health.